Item detail
github.com

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet is an AI project that RepoRadar is tracking in its Radar section, currently rated Silver tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is novelty, scored 10.0 out of 10.

Score7.9
Popularity100.0
Risklow
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.3
Novelty10.0
Momentum10.0
Maturity8.2
Open-source/build7.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential8.6
Setup ease6.5

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Useful for AI-coding-agent teams who want a 'no server, no database, no daemon' shared-experience substrate (just `git clone` + `python3 search_knowledge.py`) so a fix one agent finds for a recurring failure (pip on WSL, ChromaDB on NTFS, FANUC error codes, etc.) is searchable by every other agent on the team without standing up a vector store or a hosted knowledge service; for zero-dep Python

Who should use it

Builders Power users

Who should skip it

Skip Ikalus1988/MisakaNet unless the captured evidence suggests it solves a problem you are actively working on.

About this signal

Ikalus1988/MisakaNet is tracked by RepoRadar as an AI project in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-24; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-24. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and review needed setup difficulty. The standout signals for Ikalus1988/MisakaNet are novelty (10.0) and momentum (10.0), while setup ease (6.5) trails — that balance shapes where it fits best. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The Ikalus1988/MisakaNet record combines a 7.9/10 composite score with separate popularity (100.0), risk (low), and setup (review needed) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

Risk label is still being reviewed from the captured evidence. Treat the item as unknown-risk until you review the linked source, permissions, setup path, and data access.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Tested in a bounded workflow

Bounded representative workflow retained by RepoRadar verification harness. Last checked 2026-07-13T10:37:18.784314Z.

passed · cohort-20260712-misakanet-bm25-rrf-workflow

Tester
RepoRadar automated local verification harness
Started
2026-07-13T10:37:18.143418Z
Completed
2026-07-13T10:37:18.784314Z
Environment
Windows 10 AMD64; Python 3.11.9; credential-stripped child environment; disposable home/cache
Install/setup time
1 minute(s)
Evidence scope
Bounded representative workflow
Cleanup
Per-check temporary home and work directory removed. Shared cohort package cache removed.
Actions exercised
  • Created a disposable home, work directory, and isolated package cache with credential-like environment variables excluded.
  • Created 1 synthetic fixture file(s) inside the disposable work directory; retained hashes prove the exact inputs.
  • Tokenized three synthetic recovery lessons and built a MisakaNet BM25 corpus.
  • Asserted the NTFS lesson ranked first for its query, fused checkout and pip searches with RRF, and retained all IDs and scores.
  • Executed bounded check: Search three recovery lessons with MisakaNet BM25 and fuse two result lists with reciprocal-rank fusion.
  • Captured the complete sanitized stdout, stderr, exit status, artifact checks, and 0.64-second wall time.
Observed results
  • Command exited 0 after 0.64 seconds.
  • MisakaNet ranked chroma-ntfs first and RRF retained the expected checkout and pip recovery lessons.
  • Expected marker 'CHECK_OK top=chroma-ntfs docs=3 fused=3' was observed in retained output.
  • Validated result.json: 4 required marker(s) present and 0 excluded marker(s) absent; size and SHA-256 are retained.
Observed strengths
  • The dependency-free core supplied transparent lexical scores and multi-list rank fusion with a small API surface.
Friction
  • Lexical ranking depends on deliberate lesson wording and does not resolve synonym or semantic recall by itself.
  • Setup or runtime emitted 1 stderr line(s); the complete warnings/errors are preserved in the retained log.
Limitations
  • The pure local core test covers tokenization, lexical ranking, and RRF only; it does not validate lesson schemas, federation, semantic retrieval, or a running MisakaNet service.
  • This credential-free disposable workflow does not establish production scale, model quality, reliability under sustained use, or team adoption.

Pricing assessment: The pure-Python local core used no account, model, hosted index, or paid MisakaNet feature.

Privacy assessment: Only synthetic recovery text was tokenized and ranked in memory; no network or persistent service was involved.

Open retained test log →

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

41 dated snapshots retained from 2026-06-24 through 2026-08-13; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.9 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.3 current · -0.7 net
GitHub stars (observed)394 current · +131 net
GitHub stars394 exact observation
Versionv2.17.0
Last release2026-08-13T08:51:26Z
Maintenanceactive
Current risklow
Current verdicttry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude, LangChain

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-08-137.99.3394lowtry nowactive
2026-08-127.99.3392lowtry nowactive
2026-08-117.98.5387lowtry nowactive
2026-08-107.99.3420lowtry nowactive
2026-08-097.98.5419lowtry nowactive
2026-08-087.99.3420lowtry nowactive
2026-08-077.99.6378lowtry nowactive
2026-08-067.910.0Not recordedlowtry nownot recorded
2026-08-057.910.0Not recordedlowtry nownot recorded
2026-08-047.99.6378lowtry nowactive
2026-08-037.99.6378lowtry nowactive
2026-08-027.99.6363lowtry nowactive

Why the record changed

stars changed

Stars changed: 392 → 394.

version changed

Version changed: v2.16.0 → v2.17.0.

stars changed

Stars changed: 387 → 392.

stars changed

Stars changed: 420 → 387.

stars changed

Stars changed: 419 → 420.

stars changed

Stars changed: 420 → 419.

stars changed

Stars changed: 378 → 420.

version changed

Version changed: v2.15.0 → v2.16.0.

version changed

Version changed: v2.14.0 → v2.15.0.

stars changed

Stars changed: 363 → 378.

stars changed

Stars changed: 349 → 363.

stars changed

Source-observed stars changed: 344 → 349. This reports the retained observation delta and does not infer why the upstream change occurred.