Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
This is useful for teams standardizing agent handoffs, because the change reduces hard-coding by pushing more behavior into configurable backends.
Where this stands now
CrewAIInc/crewAI ranks #2 of 6 tracked AI Agent Frameworks items by composite score (8.4 against a section median of 8.2). The section currently carries 3 Gold, 3 Silver. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-06-18 (114 days in the current window).
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Pass on CrewAIInc/crewAI if its scope or audience does not match what your team is building right now.
About this signal
CrewAIInc/crewAI is tracked by RepoRadar as a framework in the AI Agent Frameworks section. First seen 2026-06-18; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-18. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and intermediate setup difficulty. CrewAIInc/crewAI leads on workflow potential (9.9) and maturity (8.5); its lowest signal is setup ease (6.2), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The CrewAIInc/crewAI record combines a 8.4/10 composite score with separate popularity (95.0), risk (conditional), and setup (intermediate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Autonomous flow execution increases the impact of misconfigured tools, credentials, and prompt injection in shared environments.