Item detail
github.com

big-arrow-on-the-screen

RepoRadar surfaced big-arrow-on-the-screen — a developer tool — into the Developer Tools section, where it sits at Silver tier with a 'try now' verdict. Its strongest signal is workflow potential, scored 9.3 out of 10.

Score7.8
Popularity100.0
Risknone
TierSilver
Score breakdown
Usefulness8.0
Novelty9.0
Momentum7.0
Maturity8.2
Open-source/build8.4
Evidence7.2
Workflow potential9.3
Setup ease8.8

Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.

Why it matters

Agent handoffs usually die in a terminal message nobody reads; a floating arrow aimed at the Allow button closes the human-in-the-loop gap with one command.

Where this stands now

big-arrow-on-the-screen ranks #129 of 1581 tracked Developer Tools items by composite score (7.8 against a section median of 4.9). The section currently carries 1324 Bronze, 153 Silver, 103 Gold, 1 Low Signal. RepoRadar has retained observations for this record since 2026-10-09 (1 days in the current window). Signal extremes versus the section: momentum at the 94th percentile; novelty at the 100th percentile.

Who should use it

developers running local coding agents agent-skill authors

Who should skip it

Pass on big-arrow-on-the-screen if its scope or audience does not match what your team is building right now.

About this signal

big-arrow-on-the-screen is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Developer Tools section. First seen 2026-10-09; the source record was last checked on 2026-10-09. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Silver tier and Easy setup difficulty. big-arrow-on-the-screen leads on workflow potential (9.3) and novelty (9.0); its lowest signal is momentum (7.0), so factor that in before investing setup time. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.

How this item is evaluated

The big-arrow-on-the-screen record combines a 7.8/10 composite score with separate popularity (100.0), risk (none), and setup (Easy) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.

Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.

Risk explanation

No inherent user-impacting risk is flagged from the captured evidence.

Evidence links
Closest alternatives / related signals
agents macos cli human-in-the-loop claude-code
Verification record

What RepoRadar actually verified

Discovered

Automated discovery and source capture. Last checked 2026-10-10T17:09:29.745535Z.

No editorial or hands-on review is claimed. This record remains at Discovered.

Verification sources

Longitudinal intelligence

How this decision record is moving

Raw history JSON →

2 dated snapshots retained from 2026-10-09 through 2026-10-10; see the snapshot index for explicit coverage gaps. Stars, version, release, pricing, integration, risk, maintenance, verdict, score, and momentum fields remain explicit even when a source has not reported them. Repository momentum is a normalized 0–10 RepoRadar signal; GitHub stars appear only where the popularity monitor retained exact timestamped observations.

RepoRadar score7.8 current · +0.0 net
Repository momentum9.0 current · +0.0 net
GitHub stars (observed)563 current · +249 net
GitHub stars563 exact observation
Versionv0.4.5
Last release2026-10-09T18:53:44Z
MaintenanceActive
Current riskNone
Current verdictTry now
Pricing baselineNo structured commercial pricing baseline
Pricing checkedNot applicable or not recorded
Pricing freshnessNo dated commercial pricing review
Integrations baselineClaude Code, OpenAI Codex

Recent dated points

DateScoreMomentumStarsRiskVerdictMaintenance
2026-10-107.89.0563NoneTry nowActive
2026-10-097.89.0314NoneTry nowActive

Why the record changed

Stars change

Stars changed: 497 → 563.

Version change

Version changed: v0.4.3 → v0.4.5.

Stars change

Stars changed: 314 → 497.

New entry

Newly added to RepoRadar's decision catalog.