Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for Obsidian users and Claude Code power users who want a concrete, installable second-brain workflow rather than a vague PKM prompt pack.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian if the source repository or demo is inactive, unmaintained, or no longer matches the description shown here.
About this signal
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-07-01; the source record was last checked on 2026-07-01. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian is strongest on workflow potential (9.5) and open-source/build quality (8.4) and weakest on setup ease (6.4) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian record combines a 8.4/10 composite score with separate popularity (1.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Putting this into practice? Read How to evaluate an AI tool before you adopt it for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
It can reorganize and rewrite large Obsidian vaults through Claude Code workflows, so first evaluation should happen on a copied vault rather than your canonical notes; The repo references a paid community mirror for earlier access to in-development features, so confirm the public MIT release covers the exact workflow you need before standardizing on it.