Score breakdown
Popularity is tracked separately. Support, ads, sponsorships, and tips never affect these signals.
Why it matters
Useful for Mac users building browsing or QA workflows who want an agent to use the browser session they already trust instead of spinning up a separate headless environment.
Who should use it
Who should skip it
Skip achiya-automation/safari-mcp if the source link, documentation, or setup requirements do not align with your current workflow or stack.
About this signal
achiya-automation/safari-mcp is tracked by RepoRadar as a developer tool in the Radar section. First seen 2026-06-19; the source record was last checked on 2026-06-19. The current verdict is 'try now' with a Gold tier and moderate setup difficulty. Across RepoRadar's eight signals, achiya-automation/safari-mcp is strongest on workflow potential (9.8) and practical usefulness (9.0) and weakest on setup ease (6.4) — a profile worth weighing against your own priorities. This page summarizes the public evidence on the linked source page and states where additional review is still needed.
How this item is evaluated
The achiya-automation/safari-mcp record combines a 8.7/10 composite score with separate popularity (63.0), risk (conditional), and setup (moderate) signals. See the scoring methodology for the current weights and evidence definitions.
Putting this into practice? Read How to vet an AI agent or MCP server before you wire it in for the checklist behind this score.
Risk explanation
Safari MCP can read and act inside your real browser session, so use least-privilege accounts and avoid granting it access to tabs or sites you would not trust an agent to inspect or click through.